Ignoring a process that is known to have a strong influence on the area under study.Drawing a conclusion that is contradicted by the author's own statistical or qualitative evidence.While you should read the whole paper, making the right choice of what to read first can save time by flagging major problems early on.Įditors say, " Specific recommendations for remedying flaws are VERY welcome."Įxamples of possibly major flaws include: If the paper includes tables or figures, what do they add to the paper? Do they aid understanding or are they superfluous?.If the author is disagreeing significantly with the current academic consensus, do they have a substantial case? If not, what would be required to make their case credible?.Are the conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented? Do they address the main question posed?.Is the paper well written? Is the text clear and easy to read?. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |